United States ... and the Iranian nuclear program Accounts and positions

Abstract

Back Iran's interest in building a nuclear energy program for peaceful purposes to the days of the Shah, who carried out a number of projects for the construction of a series of nuclear power plants, with the blessing of public US and Britain for Iran to become a regional powers allied to the West in the region, despite the suspension of the work on the eve of the Iranian revolution in 1979, considering that weapons of mass destruction are contrary to Islamic principles, but that the Islamic Republic has returned to care for him the day after the end of the Iraq war - Iran bearing ambitious and long-term program, giving the fundamental reason for this is to reach self-sufficiency in energy, and during the process of Iran's nuclear program has been able to attract some of the countries that did not hesitate to support it, including Russia, China, Pakistan, Germany, France and others, to testify Iran's nuclear work a new start and up to a very complex stages for all parties, whether pressing ones like the United States of America and the International Atomic Energy Agency, or intermediate as states of the European Union or those under pressure (Iran), so that the basic problem does not lie in nuclear technology, but in the revolutionary behavior of Iran the ambitions that run counter to the interests of its neighbors, especially in general and the West, while the United States is seeking to prevent Iran from acquiring a full nuclear cycle by turning the process or enrichment stage whether Iran has so voluntarily through political and diplomatic or forced roads through the Security Council and the military solution, we find look at these international attempts as a denial of the right to possess the technology and water meant keeping them belonging which make them determined to possess this ability to achieve the stature and influence required at the regional level, and here stems rejection of solutions posed by European mediators although not conclusively clarified and is subject to interpretation, the real purpose behind the pursuit of such a force. Although the United States has dealt with the nuclear issue passively through use of containment and sanctions methods as a tool to curb its nuclear ambitions from the premise that the fundamental problem is not nuclear weapons per se as they relate to the regulations specific system of government in Iran in the end is not such as the regime in Britain or China, we find that the Iran issue was considered an inalienable right to it under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and as a means to expand the sources of energy, and modern technology necessary to join up with the developed countries practice. Upon the issue of conflict and dialogue that revolves around Iran's nuclear program for several years and that carry signals about the prospects for the battle to resolve about the file by military force is found quickly stop at the end and the threat hint which Tucked available data, on the one hand the US failure in achieving the goals desired from the war on "terrorism" in addition to the predicament in Iraq and Afghanistan, on the other hand knows Iran is increasingly the "edge of the abyss" policy adopted in recent times, which is now threatening to fall into the abyss really special dimensions entered the conflict on a difficult stage, and foresaw that what was possible in the earlier stages may not be safe consequences after he moved to the conflict to more complex than simple maneuver stages, given the multiplicity of parties to the conflict, diversity and conflict of interests and Harm is not in line with the maneuver of one nature, by the issue of a settlement with Iran or change its behavior this is still not clear so far as long as it is still insisting that its nuclear program is taken seriously and speed in achieving the status of a nuclear reflect this scenario is likely to depend on Iran achieve the ultimate clear position on this issue.