Some Aspects Of Imam Husains ( pbuh ) Revolution And Their Aims

Abstract

The history of jihadic' Islam included two decisive battles . The revelation of the holy Koran , the leader of which was the prophet Mohammad ( pbuh & progeny ) who faced the most aggressive and ploy theists and decapitated them till they said : There is no god but Allah . The second decisive war was on interpretation , the leader of which was Ameer Al- Muminieen Ali Bin Abi Talib (pbuh) in which he fought the faithless, the perfidious and the renegades; he split open the injustice till took out rightness out of it as it was cited in the following hadith cited in ( Amaly Al- Tussy) : ( O' Ali, you fight for the interpretation as you did for revealing ) . There is a common characteristic for all prophet ( pbu th) when confronting and standing against the tyrants all over the ages and Imam Husain (pbuh) is the natural extension on the level of the aims ; he says : ( O' God , You know that what we did was not for the sake of getting authority and power nor was it for the sake of appealing for secular needs but rather it was for the sake of backing up and supporting religion ) . Imam Husain (pbuh) is the inheritor of the prophets' movement and route and the inheritor of the prophet Muhammad ( pbuh & progeny ) ; he is a representation and symbol for all the other Imams . He is the inheritor of Adam (pbuh) , the elite, Ibrahim (pbuh) , the intimate , Moses (pbuh) , the addresser , Jesus (pbuh) , Allah's spirit and the inheritor of Mohammad ( pbuh & progeny ) ,the darling and most intimate . This paper fell into two sections. Section one dealt with the fact that the missionary thinking is the right understanding of Islam and through it we see that in the Islamic Umma there have been two trends or routes 1 . The first is the mission route , i.e, the revolutionary and reformation group . 2. the second is the route or trend of those who copied with the corrupted reality and surrendered to the astray leaders all through the history . Each trend has its own logic . The first is the logic of revolution ( revolutionary) against the bad corrupted reality while the second is the one which calls for submission and surrender to the accomplished fact. And in order for supporters of this trend to justify their lagging behind their defeat to change the present situation , they started to accuse followers of the first trend of many accusations and untrue claims