alaiqtisar ealaa ahd aljayizin fi 'iithbat alhukm alnahwii

Abstract

The traditions of Arabs in their speech, they restricted on mentioning part of the speech and it is intended all, so they say: (he sat in the front of his convoy and left) it is intended on his convoy.The restriction means the sufficiency of a thing and not exceed it. Restric tion of transitive verbs of two objects on one object .eg (gave, wore) .if the benefit was achieved by mentioning it alone and the speech was meaningful and complete, you would say (I gave Zaid) and ( I wore Amr ) without specifying what you had given or worn to achieve the benefit.Although some linguistic structures may carry two correct meaning to approve their grammatical rules, the restriction is a must . Mentioning one of them only if one meaning is collocated with a reason, to avoid ambiguity or it is not necessary to mention the two meanings because there is no other word with the same meaning. If the speaker mistakes when he mentions an antonym of the sentence meaning ,he will restrict on the more emphasized one and so on.It clarified that restriction on one meaning achieved by leaving out what the speaker needs of meaning and keeping the necessary one. The fear of confusion or lack of peer meaning or the suspect of the addressee of the opposite of the sentence content and so on. It is divided on one of the permissible to comment on what he needs from the grammar and what may be required of meaning without other.Which called for the choice of this research is to reveal a way of proving the grammatical rule - the exclusive way in which one of the two sides is deleted without the discretion.The researcher came to the results of the most prominent that it should be limited to one of the two permissible sides generate mentioning of the other confusing between male and masculine or between the singular and plural or necessitated not to match in the language.The article required that I divide it into four sections The first section to limit the weakest form of the two permissible. The second section is limited to one of the two permissible, fearing confusion The third section is exclusive to one of the pilgrims to consider the counterpart The fourth section is exclusive to one of the permissible to carry the meaning.