The role of Security Council counter-Terrorism committees in fighting violent Extremism

Abstract

Centered concept of terrorism as (organized violence in all its forms and oriented society, or even the threat of such violence, whether that community State or group of States or political or ideological group at the hands of a regulatory nature groups with the specific aim is to bring about a state of intimidation or chaos to achieve control this society or undermining the other dominant control it). As is violent extremism ideologically and religiously intolerant to the opinion of its author are to make it deny and disbelieve the views of others without reflection in Mntqatha or moderation, renders his opinion sword categorically and lord undisputed among directs him even if I pick him or revealed other consensus not to his senses, though, so this view remains to its owner is an accountant by or on questions of him unless Oqrnh imposition and more violence and force the others and committing what is causing fear and terror and damage to third parties and then turns including reaction from someone who provided him with the law of freedom of opinion and belief to someone Asaelh criminal law specifically what is committed, according to his opinion a bigot. The fact that such cases we identified as a terrorist perpetrated by violent extremism ideologically and religiously representatives in what he is doing is affiliated with the current terrorist organizations like al-Qaeda and Daesh and Front victory and Boko Haram and others who are like-minded. To counter the risk of the former terrorist and later, especially after the events of September 11, 2001 / September in the United States, the Security Council has taken a number of decisions that found it necessary activated to try to contain this danger and its effects and even anti-caused and accountability causing local, so it was the outcome of the Council's decisions to form committees which deal to achieve the purpose of counter-terrorism resolutions such as resolution No. 1267 of 1999 and resolution No. 1373 of 2001 and resolution No. (1535) of 2004 and resolution No. (1540) for 2004, and despite the comprehensiveness very counter-terrorism in these decisions but they addressed some aspects causes of terrorism individuals and organizations and left to states to address some of the causes leading to the commission of terrorist acts, and that was including violent extremism ideologically and religiously despite the fact that all those decisions referred to the need to address extremism that. Than shape, those decisions that leave the fight against violent extremism states intellectually and religiously will not have the desired level. Some of these countries are sponsoring extremism originally and provide him all the support to become a translator violent acts, with our belief that leave the fight against violent extremism associated with thought and religion States, not the Security Council committees to combat terrorism came from careful to respect freedom of opinion and belief and religion, which received numerous provisions in international law emphasizes not compromised.Here Through this research we will try to expose the importance and the size of the role that the Security Council committees problem of combating terrorism in directly due process to fight violent extremism as one of the main drivers and dangerous in the commission of terrorist acts.