A comparative study of the values of some variables Albiukinmetekip to correction by using the remote to jump to different methods for the national team players to advanced basketball

Abstract

From the foregoing highlights the importance of research to shed light on the methods used for aiming the remote to jump and to provide the values of the most important variables Albiukinmetekip of those methods and make sure that the difference between the players in achieving the correction run, jump after reaching the highest point (the zero) and then get off of them Before reaching it, and to give adequate information about enabling trainers and teachers to develop exercises appropriate for each method according to the requirements needed hence the research problem through lack of information on the methods used correction term of jumping as well as the lack of values of the most important variables Albiukinmetekip each method of correction term that differ from jumping Bmngeradtha Albiukinmetekip achieve the correct result despite a successful correction, due to differences in pay between Either the objectives of the research were: 1 - Identifying the values of some variables Albiukinmetekip each method of Correction term of the jump of the research sample. 2 - Identify the differences in the values of some variables of the methods Albiukinmetekip Different sample. 3 - Understand the relationship between the values of some variables which elements Albiukinmetekip Inputs (variables player) with the output elements (variables ball) for each method Of these three methods. Frdita research were: 1 - There are significant differences in the values of some variables of the different methods Albiukinmetekip Of the research sample. 2 - Existence of a correlation between the values of some variables which elements Albiukinmetekip Inputs (variables player) with the output elements (variables ball) for each method Of these three methods. Key Findings: 1 - turns out that the sample of research has varied in the six variables through the use of three methods and see how the variation in the values of these variables Albiukinmetekip we find that the first method may outweigh the moral values of the maximum flexion angle of the knee joint moment of readiness on the third method is also more than the second method is also the third method in the values of this variable note that the differences do not exceed the moral (9 marks) at the same time, we find that the method I and II may homogeneity in the values of this variable in spite of apparent superiority of the method and the first difference does not exceed (0.40) class. The most important recommendations are: 1 - There should be a simple flexion in the knee joint with the player to keep the body erect may not be over-detailed bending the knees and down the trunk to Milan because it is wrong and the situation to score. 2 - emphasis on the development angle of Annex and all of the methods being mechanically important aspect in the movement of scoring and that the possibility of which is determined by the success of the process aimed at scoring as the height of the attachment to the half and at right angles to one of the requirements Albiukinmetekip task.