Interpretative jurisdiction of the Constitutional Justice (A Comparative Study)

Abstract

Abstract Interpretation of Constitutional Provisions , is an important function has a great impact and importance not less than other functions of the Constitutional Judiciary , this specilization find it's basis in the nature of judge function , judge have to interpret the legal provision , befor apply it on the specific case.This role was acted by the Constitutional Judiciary, as an indipendent specilization , listed within the provisions of the constitution , even when such refers wasn't availeble in the constitution , constitutional Judiciary do interpret the provisions of the constitution, by acting his regular function specially his role in the checking apon the constitutionality of laws and actions .From the opevious point , this research , state the important role of such kind of judiciary , and the impact of that role , in the political operation in a state , we started this research by defining interpretation specilization and it's sources , and study the role of C.J. in the functions of legislative and exicutive authorities , by it's specilization in the interpretting of the constitution.We ended this study by portraying the basic results of it , and our recommendations in this concern , we followed comparative research between the American & Egyptian , and Iraqi constitutional regime , by comparing the legal provisions in their valid constitutions :- American constitutions for the year 1787 .- French constitution for the year 1958. - Egyptian constitution for the year 2014.- Iraqi constitution for the year 2005 . As well as , by comparing the logical and judicial issues in this concern.