Link in litigation proceedings (Comparative Study )

Abstract

The scope of its work in the Procedural Service Chamber shall determine whether such acts are procedural rights or duties, and by virtue of the connection between such acts, the dispute within the Court may be settled within the principle of economy of proceedings in terms of time and expenditure, To bring together other related cases and, in accordance with the principle of the economy of the proceedings, to make conflicting provisions that are easy to implement and to resolve that dispute comprehensively from all its elements. In other words, the link between the procedural proceedings is a justice in the course of the proceedings. If the procedural legislator is the one who monopolizes jurisdiction as the sole source of the idea of association, it is worth noting that such a link may be imposed by the legislator inevitably between procedural actions and thus neither the individuals nor the court have any role in realizing or activating its effects. If the association is not inevitable, the legislator grants individuals or the court's power to contribute to the activation of its role to carry out its functions, which effectively ends the legal substantive rights of the parties to the case. Given the link between procedural actions in terms of hindering the effects of false procedural action or disabling procedural penalty, and in terms of its comprehensive effect, it is possible to identify what it is and thus distinguish it from the legal ideas that may be completely different from its nature and reality. Therefore, the study of the nature of the association in the proceedings of litigation, requires us to study in the two sections will show in the first concept of procedural link The second section will be devoted to determine the legal framework of the link.