The mystery of ibn Abi Ertoh his life and his role in the conquest and strife

Abstract

There are many historical figures who played roles are controversial in the history of the Arab Islamic state and private roles that divided the Islamic state into two rival and shed the blood of many, and divided the opinions of historians applicants about these characters according to the bias that I strove by these people to this category, such as different evaluations people of the regions that were troubled as a result of these divisions, which tasted of the horrors and consequences of these divisions, varied assessments, according to this bias also arrived evaluation of these characters among historians and the people of the regions, including jurists and scholars of hadeeth and scholars alike, arrived evaluation in many of his joints limit contrast full.Valchksah one sees the people of Almusr or city designated opinion may not see the people Almusr the other, and there is something else that may be of great importance when modern writers and scholars is the nature of dealing with such characters when you write them and avoid them for many of the events that were annexed by the folds of the historical sources, which may reveal aside certain of the life of that character and the fear raised by the reader and may be caused by the subtraction of the show for the case of a negative and the silence of that character at a time, which may reflect on the positive cases in the life of that character and try these pens overtaking or leaving is without prejudice to them and resort to excuses and justification and improve the image in this incident or those which have failed by that character for one reason or another.As much as see a section of these historians and modern writers that the Secretariat legitimate] that this is the term [allow them to such an action, the human nature is infallible, including the noble Companions (), and on this, what were their differences exacerbated even Salt blood between them took place on the other Muslims who have no guilt but diligent in loyalty to this party or that, these differences are only to be interpretations of the people who make mistakes and injuring, and narrative truth as it is and go into the bitter manner mild and equitable analysis of rational events does not diminish the opinion of researcher does not scratch the biography of this man even though it was probably with good companions and stand with neutrality about what happened events